Virtual RTD or Forum FG

[JohnFitzgerald]

Would anybody be interested in a virtual round table discussion? Maybe a friendly debate over a hot topics?

We could also do a forum focus group? Define a topic, break and investigate for a couple weeks and then post our findings.

Our knowledge and learning doesn\'t have to be isolated to individual threads.

 

[cnelk]

I like debating hot tops....

 

[JohnFitzgerald]

Ha, I fixed it Brad. :lol: (everyone: I typed \"top\" instead of \"topics\" so Brad\'s really isn\'t a pervert) :dance2:

 

[JohnFitzgerald]

So an example of a Virtual RTD. We have 6 people debating calling for elk. (pro vs. against)

1st pro posts a comment, 1 against posts a comment, 2 pro posts a comment, 2 against posts a comment, .....etc. Once at the end, the cycle snakes back to the top.

 

[Swede]

Sounds interesting and fun.
Don\'t let Brad off that easy, just because he got one right. :lol:

 

[bnsafe]

sounds fun, but i wanna be in brads debate club

 

[JohnFitzgerald]

So do we have CNELK, SWEDE, and BNSAFE on the \"against\" side?

I guess that means I\'m on the \"for\" side.....all alone and nobody to play with?

 

[WW]

Nope! :mg:

 

[bnsafe]

oh no, im not on a side at all. sounds like a good idea to me. i just wouldnt have much to contribute. but sounds like a good way to make some friends, or enemies, lol. i just thought brads debate was more interesting, lol.

 

[Tdiesel]

john I\'ll jump in but not sure if you will want me on your team or not I just might end up being the MVP for the other team. :train: you know the type.

 

[Swede]

John put WW on the \"against\" side, and I will be on the \"for\" team.

 

[JohnFitzgerald]

So it sounds like we have,

Pro calling for elk: John, WW
Against calling for elk: Swede

CNELK - do you want to help Hootie out?

Tdiesel - You as a hunter can represent either side. You\'ve seen and heard enough to participate.

Still Hunter - We\'d definitely could use you on Swedes side.

Maybe after we cycle through, should reverse sides? Putting yourself in other shoes can definitely be an educational experience.

 

[Swede]

Sounds great to me. I don\'t think you will stand a chance. I just hope you guys are good losers. :lol: To give yourselves a chance, see if you can talk Troy into helping. He would be great too.

 

[cnelk]

OK guys, I went fishing tonight so Im playing catch up.
What are we debating and who on who\'s side?

Im in for whatever

 

[JohnFitzgerald]

Calling for elk during hunting season. Pro\'s and Con\'s

WW, JohnFitzgerald, Tdiesel = Pro side
Swede, CNELk = Con side

We need one more on the Con\'s team?

Swede - Ha, I got Bill with me. He\'s our #4 batter......and that ball is.......gone! :agg:

 

[Ol' Arky]

I must be too dumb to even find the debate forum... :? :?

 

[JohnFitzgerald]

I must be too dumb to even find the debate forum... :? :?

It\'s not ready yet. It will be a special link off the main page.

Ol\' Arky - Did you just volunteer to be on the Cons Side?

 

[Ol' Arky]

I must be too dumb to even find the debate forum... :? :?

It\'s not ready yet. It will be a special link off the main page.

Ol\' Arky - Did you just volunteer to be on the Cons Side?

I guess since Swede and Brad need reenforcements... :mrgreen: :mrgreen: But I may wobble from side to side durin\' the debate...

 

[WW]

John, I\'m only on your side if Troy joins our ranks. However, I\'m always on any side that disagrees with Swede. He\'s too old to know very much about anything. Let me rephrase that. Swede is too old to (remember) much about anything! :haha:

 

[JohnFitzgerald]

Troys on vacation....I already tried.

Pro Side: WW, JohnFitzgerald, and Tdiesel
Con Side: CNELK, Swede, and Ol\' Arky

Are we ready?