iccyman001
New member
- Apr 30, 2014
- 5,489
So let me start with two iconic states for two different species.
When you want to think of chasing big whitetail, usually Iowa comes to mind.
When you think of elk, usually Colorado comes to mind.
But is it REALLY worth it to some of you to fall into this \"point trap\"?
To draw as a non resident for IOWA these days you are looking at 3 preference points and then a tag.
$50+$50+$50+$729......
The same goes for Colorado....
So when it is all said and done, you are waiting a couple years to spend close to or over 1K for a tag alone, that is not even breaking into cost of the trip.
Is this reasonable to you? If so, why? Is it saving for a quality hunt? Are you saving for a chance at a bruiser?
I love big horned animals, but I also love money....
For whitetail you have states like Missouri, Oklahoma, Nebraska, etc that are OTC and their tags run anyways from 225-500. Usually those tags include MULTIPLE tags. (MO-2, OK-6)
Then for ELK you have OTC units and zero point draw units that also house monster bulls (Just ask Brad, Lou, or Will)
On top of that you have ID.
This is just a discussion piece.
So if you save points like this, why do you do it?
Part of the reason I asked this is to follow on with a theme that Brad started a little while ago and that AndyJ reiterated yesterday.
Hunters egos/trying to impress the internet.
I have a buddy who used to love hunting. He was a master of Massachusetts. He has killed more whitetail and turkeys than anyone I know.
But then he started posting online and MAs deer became too small. Now all he does is hunt KS, MO, and IA. He pays for guides, preference points, and does not hunt like he used to. Did he become a lazy hunter? Is he just getting horns for the show?
Sorry, now I am just rambling. What is your take on all of this?
When you want to think of chasing big whitetail, usually Iowa comes to mind.
When you think of elk, usually Colorado comes to mind.
But is it REALLY worth it to some of you to fall into this \"point trap\"?
To draw as a non resident for IOWA these days you are looking at 3 preference points and then a tag.
$50+$50+$50+$729......
The same goes for Colorado....
So when it is all said and done, you are waiting a couple years to spend close to or over 1K for a tag alone, that is not even breaking into cost of the trip.
Is this reasonable to you? If so, why? Is it saving for a quality hunt? Are you saving for a chance at a bruiser?
I love big horned animals, but I also love money....
For whitetail you have states like Missouri, Oklahoma, Nebraska, etc that are OTC and their tags run anyways from 225-500. Usually those tags include MULTIPLE tags. (MO-2, OK-6)
Then for ELK you have OTC units and zero point draw units that also house monster bulls (Just ask Brad, Lou, or Will)
On top of that you have ID.
This is just a discussion piece.
So if you save points like this, why do you do it?
Part of the reason I asked this is to follow on with a theme that Brad started a little while ago and that AndyJ reiterated yesterday.
Hunters egos/trying to impress the internet.
I have a buddy who used to love hunting. He was a master of Massachusetts. He has killed more whitetail and turkeys than anyone I know.
But then he started posting online and MAs deer became too small. Now all he does is hunt KS, MO, and IA. He pays for guides, preference points, and does not hunt like he used to. Did he become a lazy hunter? Is he just getting horns for the show?
Sorry, now I am just rambling. What is your take on all of this?